Legit or bust…

I need to preface this post with this.  Anything that flows from my fingers onto this virtual parchment is my own opinion and is wholly separate from any opinion held by government agencies or school districts.

So, it appears as though we have folks moaning and groaning about another apparent “bust”.  I’m reading stuff like, “The SPC highlighted us and NOTHING HAPPENED.”  “Has the SPC lost it’s mind?”  Both of these statements – and similar beliefs held by others – are rooted in ignorance.  I’m willing to bet none of the offending principals realize what the SPC risk outlooks are or what they’re supposed to mean.  If they won’t take it upon themselves to learn, let me educate them.

The SPC outlooks are meant to describe what COULD happen given the atmospheric conditions present, not what WILL happen.  These outlooks are refined throughout the day in response to ever-changing atmospheric and weather conditions.  These “ever-changing atmospheric and weather conditions” equate to any number of variables within the atmosphere the weather models can’t see due to resolution limitations.  These variables that change during the day of an event are called microscale features.

Take, for example, our last event where “nothing happened”.  The outlook was issued according to what the SPC forecasters saw on the vast number of weather models employed by NOAA.  These forecasters have forgotten more weather than you, me, or any other armchair meteorologist has learned.  They are the best of the best.  The weather models, even the short range suites, have a hard time picking up on microscale features.  Atmospheric mixing is a microscale feature.  It cannot be picked up by medium-range modeling.  Could the forecasters envision a scenario where mixing could be a possibility?  Sure, but these guys and gals don’t operate on possibilities.  They make a forecast based on actual data in front of them.

The factors that dictated today’s event were picked up very early in the forecast cycle.  The threat outlooks were changed accordingly as the data changed.  I think one would agree that that is a reasonable response.  The idea that not everyone would see a storm was realized very early on.  The atmospheric conditions favored scattered activity as opposed to a linear event.  That’s why your “Twitter-ologists” used the term low probability/high impact events.  The SPC modified the risk areas as a response to this morning’s model data.  Remember, it’s not what WILL happen, but what COULD happen.

Unfortunately, that low probability/high impact event turned into a high probability event as a tornado more than likely touched down (will need to wait for survey teams to confirm) in Bedford Co and made a mess of a person’s farm.  You won’t hear him crying wolf about an apparent bust.  The forecast verified.  I believe that part of Bedford Co was included in a MODERATE risk with a 10% tornado chance happening within 25 miles of a point.  Guess what…it verified for this farm owner.

Now, let’s discuss schools for a second.  You will NEVER hear me give an opinion one way or another against a school making a decision to close schools.  As a parent of two, given the choice of having my child in school or with me during a severe storm, I want him with me.  The school district cannot have buses caught out on the roads when tornadoes are a possibility.  There is simply no mechanism available for a school bus full of children to find adequate shelter when out on a route.  Not to mention the liability risk the school district would incur if the unthinkable happened.  Let’s not forget, our educators are more than likely parents, too.  They deserve to be with their children just as much as you deserve to be with yours.  There was an incident at Plaza Towers Elementary School in Moore, Oklahoma back in 2013.  A tornado struck the school during the normal scheduled day and seven children were killed when a wall fell on them.  I don’t want to be the parent running towards a destroyed school scared to death wondering if my child is hurt.  The schools have days built into the schedule for inclement weather.  Inclement weather just doesn’t mean snow.

I know my opinion might be dissenting to one of your own, and I’m fine with that.  It’s my opinion and I own it.  I’m not going to bump you off of your opinion.  You and I both know that’s a fools errand.  Just know that when a forecast “busts” because YOU didn’t get a storm doesn’t mean it busted for the farm owner who lost a barn, or the guy who had a roof blown off his house, or the lady whose grandmother was injured when her mobile home overturned.  The world just doesn’t revolve around you…it revolves around all of us.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Legit or bust…

  1. Reblogged this on Confessions of a Cluttered Mind and commented:
    It always bothers me when people bash prognosticators and school officials, no matter the decisions made for safety’s sake as it applies to weather conditions. This is an excellent read.

    • ruthseverewx says:

      Thank you! I was hit with so many questions about schools as it related to another perceived bust, I had to vent…and it wouldn’t fit into 140 characters. Thanks for taking the time to read it!

  2. Thank you for doing what you do and saying what you said. My family and I appreciate you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s